Read the market evidence
Customer reviews, job posts, community threads, competitor customers and existing alternatives, alongside your own call notes. We read what the market has already said about this problem before defining anything.
This engagement turns your ICP, prospecting criteria and account evidence into a process you or your first hire can run, learn from and improve.
You need to know what that company is dealing with, why your product matters to them in particular, what each follow-up is for, and what to say when the conversation actually starts. A prioritised list on its own answers none of this.
Nothing turns what the team knows about that account into a reason for them to keep reading.
Each touch goes out because a day passed, and no one decided what it was for.
Nobody prepares the conversation, so what the team worked out stays in the notes while the usual deck gets run.
Nothing tells the rep what is actually behind it, and those deals rarely go to a competitor. They just stop moving.
Your Situational ICP and prospecting system establish where to focus. This work carries that context through account research, outreach and conversations, with each response informing what happens next.
For each prioritised account we bring together the company context, fit evidence, buying triggers and supporting signals — and separate what is verified from what is still an assumption worth checking.
We connect the account's situation to a problem your product can address. The message draws on the evidence in the research brief and explains why your product may be relevant to that company. Each draft comes to you for review and approval before it is sent.
We build the sequence around the buying situation. The opening message establishes relevance; each follow-up adds context, develops the point or approaches the problem from a different angle. The sequence should support a conversation, not fill a calendar with sends.
Outreach does not end when someone replies. We build a practical approach to pre-call research, discovery and qualification — then a loop that feeds what you learn back into targeting and messaging.
Claude Code
Clay
Apify
Trigify
Notion
Common Room
RB2B
Humantic AI
Lemlist
Instantly
HeyReach
HubSpot
Attio
Slack
Each engagement includes the work before it. Weeks 1–8 are the Situational ICP and the prospecting system; if those already exist, you start at week nine.Hover or tap any week to see what happens in it.
Customer reviews, job posts, community threads, competitor customers and existing alternatives, alongside your own call notes. We read what the market has already said about this problem before defining anything.
Company fit, the outcome the buyer owns, the problem in the way and the workaround they use today — plus who feels it, who owns it and who could champion a change. In the same week we identify what could move the problem up the list.
What the buyer is trying to achieve, what they compare you against and what would delay a decision. Week 05 puts the draft in front of real buyers and corrects it where they disagree.
We turn the Situational ICP and buying triggers into rules a system can apply, then use them to pull relevant companies from the data sources that suit your market and filter the poor matches out before they reach a list.
Buying triggers get monitored with corroboration rules, then fit, signals and context combine into a model that separates accounts ready for outreach from those needing investigation. Inbound is qualified against the same criteria.
For each prioritised account we pull together company context, fit evidence, buying triggers and supporting signals — keeping what is verified separate from what is still an assumption worth checking before anyone makes contact.
We take the messaging pillars from the Situational ICP and connect them to the evidence for each account. A signal is a reason to research, not a licence to assume you know what the buyer is thinking.
The opening message establishes relevance; each follow-up adds context, develops the point or comes at the problem from another angle. We define the role of every touch, when to follow up, and when to stop.
Pre-call research, discovery questions and qualification guidance, so the team walks in with context. Then the feedback loop: how replies, objections and call outcomes get captured and fed back into targeting and messaging.
You own the engine at the end of week twelve. The research briefs, the messaging guidance, the sequences, the conversation guides and the feedback loop are handed over in full — documented so the reasoning transfers, not just the templates. This is a build engagement: your team owns the sending and the conversations, which is the point. What you learn from doing it is what makes the loop work at all.
You will leave with a documented outbound process your team runs and improves. You will not leave with someone else sending your emails — and that is deliberate, because the replies are the research.
The scope depends on the number of accounts and channels involved, the current state of your prospecting system, and how much of the outbound process has to be designed from scratch rather than tidied up. We work with your existing tools where practical — the aim is a system your team owns, not another stack of subscriptions to maintain.
This is a build engagement, not outsourced campaign execution. Your team owns sending and ongoing campaign operations. Everything above is handed over as a documented outbound engine your team can run, learn from and improve.
The questions that come up most often. If yours is missing, bring it to the call.
The outbound engine relies on a clear Situational ICP and a reliable way to identify relevant accounts. This engagement includes those foundations where they are needed. If your existing work already covers them we start from what is in place, and the engagement is shorter for it.
Yes. The scope includes messaging guidance, account-specific approaches, sequences and follow-ups. The work is grounded in your ICP, the account evidence and your messaging pillars — not a generic template library with your product name dropped in.
No. This is not an outsourced SDR service or a managed campaign agency. I build the process and work with you until it is usable. Your team owns the sending, the campaign operations and the conversations — because what you learn from doing it is the entire point of the feedback loop.
A template begins with words. This begins with the account and the reason it may be worth contacting; the sequence follows from that. Your team also gets the research and decision rules needed to adapt the message when the situation differs, which is the part a template cannot give you.
That is a good reason to make the process explicit rather than a problem with it. We document what has to be understood before outreach, how to connect the product to the buyer’s situation, and how to qualify a conversation. The goal is to transfer the reasoning, not to ask someone to imitate your personality.
No, and be wary of anyone who says otherwise. The engagement builds the process and materials your team uses to run outbound consistently. Outcomes still depend on the market, the offer, the account evidence, the execution and how buyers respond. The feedback loop is there so you learn and adjust rather than assume the first approach works everywhere.
Not necessarily. We start by understanding what you already use and what the process actually needs. Additional tools are considered only where they solve a real problem, and weighed against the budget.
Your team runs it and learns from the market. The documentation and the feedback loop are what let you improve it without me. If you want help refining the motion later, that can be scoped separately — but the engagement is built to finish, not to roll on.
A Sales Navigator search, an Apollo or Clay export, or a spreadsheet you started and never finished. We take a few accounts from it and work through what the public evidence actually says about each one.